Through the Integral Humanism Initiative, the focus is on demonstrating the impact of Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s philosophy in bridging divides across academia, society, and corporations.
Star Pipe Foundry, Rajkot, India.
Integral Humanism, as envisioned by Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya, is the foundation of humanity, emphasizing the balanced integration of humans with their surroundings. It recognizes the material and spiritual dimensions, aiming for mutual dependence and co-existence among all forms of life. This philosophy, rooted in Indian traditions, offers a unique perspective on socio-political and economic development, focusing on the organic unity of materiality and spirituality.
Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s concept of “Integral Humanism” advocates a human-centric worldview, seeking harmony between material and spiritual aspects. Ekatma Manav Darshan and Integral Education are key components, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all forms of life. The initiative at the Centre for Human Sciences, Rishihood University, explores these ideas across various disciplines.
The failures of various economic and social models have led to a realization of the importance of Integral Humanism. Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s philosophy provides a human-centric perspective, promoting organic unity and integrity between materiality and spirituality. His thoughts on nationalism, economics, politics, and spirituality remain relevant in a world dominated by greed and identity conflicts.
Indian thought, unlike the Western concept, views individuals as universes and emphasizes interconnectedness. Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s philosophy goes beyond Western frameworks, promoting “Decolonization” by valuing Sanskrit, heritage, and political activism. His ideas on Rajneeti, Arthaneeti, Samaj, and Rashtra highlight the importance of duty-oriented governance and the role of families in societal strengthening.
Indian political thought, as described in the Mahabharata’s Shanti Parva, differs from Western concepts. Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay advocates for democracy with sanskaras, cautioning against excessive democracy leading to anarchy. The emphasis is on individual and societal responsibility, discipline, and consciousness.
The Indian political thought is beautifully explained in the Mahabharata’s Shanti Parva where Bheeshma Pitamaha gave the teaching of Raj Dharma which can be said as the first polis of Bharat. Indian political thought as described by the term Rajaneeti is not synonymous with the term, Politics. Rajneeti has three important aspects: Rajya (Polis), Rajya Tantra (Policy), and Raj Dharma (duty of ruler). It is because of this that autocracy never suited Indian political thought as the kings were bound by the concept of Dharma. Similarly, the natives were not called ‘citizens’ but ‘rashtraang’ meaning an integral part of Rashtra.
Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay talks about democracy without sanskaras. He believed that excessive democracy leads to anarchy. Democracy is just an instrument to fulfill a nation’s needs. He states that there is no conflict between individuals and society. The effectiveness of this instrument solely depends on the feeling of the people towards the nation, their consciousness of taking responsibility, and living a life with discipline. Unbridled liberty does not lead to the progress of an individual but to his ruin. The world can become happy with the concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and never with sovereignty or markets.
Indian thought promotes “Bhu Sanskriti” and “Jan Judav,” contrasting with Western individualism. The concept of Rashtra, rooted in “chitt” (consciousness), emphasizes interconnectedness and the pursuit of collective happiness.
India believes in Bhu Sanskriti and Jan Judav, in contrast to the ideas of sovereignty and individualism of the West. The West believes that the souls of every individual are separate and individualistic, whereas the Indian thought says that one atma resides in all living creatures. When things are seen in discrete form, man (Vyakti), society (samaj), nation (rashtra), the world (Vishwa), nature (prakriti), nature (vanaspati), environment (vatavaran) – all are connected with each other.
The world today talks about Sustainable development, lest we understand that it is inherent in all the Indian thought heritage. From the very beginning, the Indian society has been functioning around the nature of what was available locally and based on self-reliance. Basic Indian living was based on the concept of a harmonious and inseparable relationship between human beings and nature.
The origin of the word “Nation” is in the word “native” which is essentially connected to the idea of race. In India, the word “nation” was translated as “jati” in the 1920s and 1930s by celebrated Indian poets like Sumitranandan Pant and Nirala. Badrishah Thulghariya in his book “Daishik Shastra” presents the quintessence of Bhartiya Civilization. He also uses the word “jati” for “nation”, the origin of which is from the word “janm”. So, the word ‘Rashtra’ does not have a similar word in English. Rashtra is not a nation. The word Rashtra is based on the concept of “Ekatva ” rather than birth or race. The form of Rashtra is seen in “chitt” (consciousness). The distinct expression of intelligence or awareness (chaitanya) is chitt (consciousness). It sees life as a journey from “limit to limitless”. The goal of Rashtra is the betterment of the world. It keeps the condition of one’s ultimate happiness, joy, sukha, ananda which can be attained only through serving others. ‘Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinaha’ highlights the importance of keeping others happy in order to attain one’s happiness. It emphasizes interconnectedness between all living beings as one soul resides in all. Hence, Indian thought never had the concept of “Individualism”. The word “Individual” comes from the Latin word “individuus” meaning, which cannot be further divided. It is wrongly translated in hindi as “vyakti”. “Vyakti ” comes from the word “vykta” which means “to express”. When a human being expresses what he sees is called “vyakti”. When “chitti” expresses itself it becomes the “vyaktitva” of that person. And this vyaktitva becomes the foundation of building a “rashtra” As Dr. Hegdewar says, “Rashtriya naturally meant ‘Hindu’ because it does not refer to a mere community living in India but to the reality that the land belongs to them. Even just one Hindu is enough to be called a “Rashtra”. The idea of an individual is completely distinct in both cultures. From Rashtra, also comes ‘Rashtranga’ which is derived from the root word ‘rat’ meaning “that which shines” and having the same dreams, goals, and aspirations. Hence the idea of Rashtra is not divisive in nature. It is a wholesome idea that believes that the entire world needs to be happy for me to be happy. This expansive nature of Rashtra must be manifested in our economics, polity education, etc where Chitt is the soul of Rashtra which determines the rise and downfall of Rashtra.It is not a mere congregation and land, soil, and rocks.
Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyay emphasizes nation-building through individuals, families, and societies rooted in Indian values. Education plays a crucial role, with a focus on spiritual and moral development through Dharma. The interrelationship between individuals and society is depicted in a social order cube.
Pandit ji laid emphasis on nation-building through developing individuals, families, societies, and institutions through inculcating bhartiya values in education. He was of the view that education develops multi-dimensional personalities rooted in Indian ethos with strong character to lead societies, institutions, and nations. He also believed in the quality of teachers when he highlighted a hymn, “‘वयं राष्ट्रे जागृयाम पुरोहिताः” . He was of the opinion that education can inculcate values desired in the 21st century like sustainable development, self-dependence, individual freedom, social justice, culture preservation, etc.
He laid utmost emphasis of the spiritual and moral development of an individual by following Dharma through 4 aggregate attributes i.e body, mind, heart, and intellect. He has explained the relationship between them through the following diagram which shows the growing levels of consciousness beginning from a single entity of “self” and expanding to the acceptance of the “universe” as its own, which shows that there are no conflicts between these entities and God can be attained once we accept the universe as part of our existence. It further says we are God-minded people hence we have intimate mutual relationships with all the entities of this universe, expounding on our very traditional thought of “dharma”. India very well demonstrated “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” during the global Covid pandemic which will take centuries to get fixed in the global thought heritage.
He explained the interrelationship between an individual, society, and nation with the help of a social order cube as follows:
The figure explains that society is the higher manifestation of an individual. ABCD represents the individual and FGHI represents society. There is a give and take between both.
Deen Dayal ji critiques Western philosophies, advocating for harmony with nature and balance in resource use. Antyodaya, emphasizing the rise of the last person in society, and Ekatma Arthneeti, promoting balanced resource use, are central to his economic philosophy. Technology adoption, decentralization, and local production are also key aspects.
Deendayal ji’s works give a critique of Western philosophies that lead to the exploitation of natural resources, excessive consumerism for profits, capitalism, and socialism. He explains that a man should conduct himself in harmony with nature, whereas the west believes in individual supremacy over society and conquest of nature for its own benefits. The West believes in “survival of the fittest” whereas Bharatiya culture believes in protecting those who are weak because that is the only way a civilization can survive. The West gives utmost importance to struggle and conflicts and takes them to be the basis of society whereas Indian philosophy believes that all creatures are interdependent and complementary to each other and that there is no question of struggle. Their philosophies of capitalism and socialism are based on conflicts, struggle and atheism, and selfishness. The Indian values teach us to balance the use of labor, capital, and resources.
Deen Dayal ji was a proponent of the idea of Antyodaya to bring those at the bottom of society to the top. His slogan “Har hath ko kaam har khet ko paani” laid utmost emphasis on agriculture and employment. He always believed agriculture to be our biggest strength but rather for several years we were trying to strengthen our weakness. It was not realized that a strong rural sector will raise demand for industrial products and it can happen only when the government works to raise the income of the people of the rural sector who have the maximum population residing there. Increasing their purchasing power should be the prime motive to boost the economy. Deendayalji believed that “Cow and Ox is the base of farming”.
Deen Dayal ji has also discussed ‘Ekatma Arthneeti’ where he talks about the balanced use of resources. According to Western philosophy, a man becomes addicted to acquiring wealth without any end and he always feels the dearth of material pleasures. Deen Dayal ji believed that ‘arth’ cannot solely be a motivator to a man. Both capitalism and socialism regard man as ‘economic man’ instead of ‘sampurna manav’. He is measured in quantitative terms and not qualitative.
Deendayal ji was also a firm believer in adopting the latest technologies and keeping up with the developments. But it is important to use technology rationally and not blindly follow the West. The technology used should be such that it leads to the development of humanism. Other than these, he has given utmost importance to decentralization, local production, private ownership, upskilling, etc.
Hence following are the objectives based on Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s unique ideology and its relevance in the modern era:
Research Associate
Research Associate
Research Associate
Research Associate, IHI
Intern
Intern
Intern
Intern
Welcome to the Integral Humanism Initiative! Integral Humanism is a philosophy that embraces the entirety of human existence, encompassing both spiritual and material progress. As an intern, you are an essential part of our collective journey toward a holistic understanding of humanity and its potential.
An MBA student turned intern who introduced the concept of "Antodaya" and displayed exceptional empathy towards the workers, advocating for their welfare and rights within the company. Passionate about creating inclusive environments and driving positive change in corporate culture.
Case studyThe innovative psychology intern at CHS, renowned for her ability to translate complex concepts like purusharthas into playful, child-friendly terms. With her knack for simplifying the profound, she's bridging the gap between theory and understanding, one young mind at a time.
Research Article E-BookA forward-thinking MBA candidate with a passion for blending business acumen with social impact. Leveraging internship experience, they authored a groundbreaking monograph exploring the transformative power of Conscious Social Responsibility in shaping Corporate Social Responsibility paradigms.
The visionary MBA student who seamlessly integrated cutting-edge technology with traditional business models during their internship. Their ingenious idea of placing the "chitti" at the heart of operations proved not only innovative but also immensely successful, revolutionizing the industry landscape.
Magazine PPTA compassionate BBA student with a passion for understanding societal concerns, demonstrated empathy during an internship by connecting with farmers' challenges. Successfully bridged the gap between farmers' needs and Pandit Deen Dayal's vision, showcasing adept alignment of business strategies with social responsibility.
Research PaperINTEGRAL HUMANISM INITIATIVE team met with Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma Ji at Ekatm Bhavan, New Delhi. The meeting agenda focused on introducing the project on “Integral Human Initiative” currently ongoing at Rishihood University in Sonipat, Haryana. The following points were discussed:
Team IHI at Centre for Human Sciences along with the director Dr Sampadananda Mishra ji visited a residential school for tribal girls situated in Majhgawan, Madhya Pradesh. The project was started and supported by Deendayal Research Institute (DRI) which was founded by Late Nanaji Deshmukh. The school aims at all round development of the downtrodden scheduled tribe’s students through education, vocational training and good conduct. Extension and dissemination of education in tribal villages so as to join them with the national mainstream. The school has been developed in a way so that it can stand as a role model for the other educational institutes.
The team of Integral Humanism embarked on a thought-provoking journey, driven by the motive of conducting a comparative study between Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s Integral Humanism and Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Education. In their engaging conversation with Alok Pandey ji, several profound insights emerged, shedding light on the essence of their respective philosophies and the potential intersection of their ideas.
Sampadananda Mishra initiated the dialogue by drawing parallels between Sri Aurobindo’s concept of a spiritualized society and Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s vision for societal transformation. He emphasized that true progress in the political realm could only be achieved through a fundamental shift in human consciousness. He stressed the significance of understanding the concept of Raj Dharma, highlighting its deep-rooted connection with the Indian ethos. Alok Pandey ji responded by noting a critical shift in Sri Aurobindo’s teachings post-1930, where he shifted his focus from yoga for humanity to yoga for the sake of the divine. He suggested that both Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Sri Aurobindo shared a common emphasis on the importance of the human element. Pandey ji delved into the unique aspects of their philosophies, particularly emphasizing the idea that man is not the final destination in the evolutionary journey. He touched upon the concept of conscious evolution and Sri Aurobindo’s inclusive approach, where no subject is considered untouchable. The conversation continued with the team exploring the role of politics as a means of manifesting the divine in creation. They discussed the idea of “Raj Dharma” and how it should be aligned with the broader vision of human and societal growth. Pandey ji stressed the importance of keeping the nation at the center of political endeavors. He highlighted the need for conscious choices and the development of inner evolutionary processes, particularly within the education system. He emphasized that education should foster the ability to make choices rather than imposing beliefs. The discussion then turned to the question raised by Akhil ji about the role of religions and whether they focus on the human core. Pandey ji expressed his skepticism, suggesting that religions often prioritize survival rather than progress. He urged for questions about universal standards of conduct and advocated involving children in the exploration of these questions, listening to their perspectives, and encouraging critical thinking. Abhishek ji raised the issue of developing a curriculum that incorporates the teachings of visionaries like Aurobindo and Vivekananda. Pandey ji suggested inviting individuals who are committed to going beyond conventional approaches. He also cautioned against a superficial approach to religious exposure and recommended teaching children how to make choices instead. Pandey ji believed that democracy without education is incomplete, and that the education system should encourage innovation, creativity, and originality.
Sampadananda Mishra proposed exposing students to nature and the laws of the natural world to instill a deeper understanding of the sacredness of things. He emphasized the importance of letting children explore and discover the essence of various concepts, like the cow representing a deeper spiritual reality. The team concluded that targeting teachers and providing them with good books and resources could be an effective approach to spreading the teachings of Sanatan Dharma. They also discussed the potential of separate classes for conscious living and holistic knowledge to nurture the core values of generosity and courage in students. In essence, the conversation with Alok Pandey ji unveiled the intricate intersections between the philosophies of Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Sri Aurobindo, while also addressing the vital role of education and conscious choices in fostering spiritual and societal growth. It highlighted the need to rethink conventional approaches and inspire a deeper understanding of the profound wisdom embedded in Indian thought.
Kittu Reddy Da, a wise soul shares a profound connection with the spiritual luminary, Sri Aurobindo. Though he never engaged in direct discourse, he shares his darshan of Sri Aurobindo 42 times, these all instances are so close to his heart that he even knew all the years in which he saw. Among these ethereal encounters, one memory stands out—a moment when Sri Aurobindo leaned towards the Mother and whispered, “The future is now safe.”
Delving into the heart of his experiences with the Mother, Kittu Da paints a portrait of love personified. Mother’s gentle pats and affection for children created a realm of warmth. In one vivid recollection, as he was playing with his friends and suddenly, they started fighting, and mother was watching all this from behind. Surprisingly, she inquired if he could read French, handed him a poem, and praised his reading, bestowing upon him a pat on the head. This initiated a daily ritual, forging a deep connection between them.
When questioned about his book, Kittu Da humbly confesses that he has never authored a book entirely on his own. Instead, he has been guided by others. The Mother herself once encouraged him to write on history, an endeavor that spanned decades in a time before computers. Eventually, his chapters found their way to publication, and he continued to write, adding to his literary legacy. Reflecting on what to impart to young minds aged 5 to 8, Kittu Da advocates avoiding forceful instruction towards the teachings to k-12. Instead, he suggests weaving the stories of Mother and Sri Aurobindo into their education. Children, he asserts, are drawn to narratives over dry theories. Memories from his own sensitive age of 9 to 10 have stayed with him, emphasizing the importance of experiential learning. Life, he insists, must be tasted, and savored like seasoned fruit preserves to truly understand its essence.
Finally, when asked about the secret to a good life, Kittu Da’s wisdom resonates: “One Earth, One family, One Future.” In his role as a teacher, Kittu Reddy imparts the teachings of Sri Aurobindo and soft skills to military personnel, an act rooted in his belief that every Indian should serve physically and psychologically in the Indian Army—a sentiment deeply honored by Mother and Sri Aurobindo themselves. To encapsulate his cherished memories, there are treasured relics—a gift from the Mother to Kittu Da’s mother, adorned with her handwritten message, and a picture of Sri Aurobindo graced with his autograph, tangible mementos of a life touched by the divine.
The conversation with Deshpandeyji delves into profound insights regarding Integral Humanism (IH), its connection with India’s past, and the challenges of contemporary society. Deshpandeyji articulates how IH draws its strength from the continuity of India’s historical legacy, aligning it with the Swadeshi movement and advocating for self-reliance. This self-reliance, however, is seen not merely as economic independence but as the need for creative originality, something that has been somewhat lacking in Indian thought.
The conversation raises critical questions about the absence of genuine innovation within Indian philosophy, highlighting that agriculture and industry are secondary concerns compared to the deeper issue of fostering creativity and self-expression. Deshpandeyji emphasizes that IH should organically emerge as a result of individuals being self-creative rather than being imposed from above. The discussion reflects on the pillars of Indian thought such as Swaraj, Swadesh, and boycott, underscoring the need for ideas to originate from within and express themselves to have a true impact on society. The conversation underscores the importance of a holistic vision that encompasses various aspects of life and society, suggesting that IH may not have lived up to its potential due to a lack of a comprehensive and visionary approach. The discussion then shifts to the objectives of a specific project aimed at integrating the teachings of great masters into school education. The conversation raises questions about the quality and universality of education, and there is a call to maintain the universality of the English language, acknowledging its significance in the global context. The conversation cautions against being too insular and advocates for a broader perspective that encompasses diverse influences, including those from the West. Deshpandeyji notes the changing dynamics of the modern world, emphasizing the importance of adapting to the times. The conversation raises questions about India’s readiness for contemporary challenges, including technological advancements like bullet trains and modern communication methods. It questions whether IH, as originally conceived by DDU, is in sync with the evolving needs of the nation.
The conversation ultimately advocates for a shift in focus from preserving an idealized version of IH to preparing for the advancements and challenges of the future. It alludes to Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy, emphasizing the need for humanity to be spiritually and practically ready to receive the transformative forces of the divine. Deshpandey ji’s insights highlight the importance of adaptability, creativity, and a broader perspective in the context of IH and India’s development.
The International Conference on Integral Humanism aims to foster a comprehensive understanding of this worldview and its contemporary significance. It serves as a platform to unite scholars, researchers, and practitioners across diverse fields, promoting meaningful discourse.
Text box item sample content